1992 GMC K10 User Comment / Complaint

1992 GMC K10 User Comment / Complaint

HOME » G » GMC » K10 » 1992 » Seal » comment/complaint
1997-04-08 00:00:00 Escanaba, MI

The rear and front seals were leaking.

Send us your comment

Email
change GMC
Comment Requirements
Email
* Required - We will send a verification link to this email before your comment is posted.
Password
Optional - If you leave many comments and do not want to verify each one individually, put a password in this field. Your first comment will still need to be verified, but after it has you will be able to post comments immediatlely without having to wait for the verification email from our servers.
Location
Optional - City & State if you live in the US or Canada, City & Country if you live anywhere else
Make / Model / Year
* Required
Image Form Verification
* Required
Password
change K10
Location
change 1992
Comment    Max Characters: 1000 -- Remaining: 1000
Security Image Enter letters from box to the left
   
1997-04-08 Escanaba, MI
The rear and front seals were leaking.  view
2006-10-30 Portland, ME
2004 toyota solara this car is a manufacturers defect 100%. i have replaced 2 sets of brakes, rotors, calipers both right side. also both inner tie rod ends and right cv shaft, wheel bearings. a new battery the interior is falling apart and the car is all over the road pulling to the right. toyota refused to replace most of the parts as they say not covered under the new warranty.  view
2006-10-30 Clearwater, FL
I have a failure in progress that seems to be affecting other owners of winnebago motorhomes and not just mine. due to light gauge metals used in the step mounting areas and improper attachement proceedures used during manufacture the entry step mounting plate is cracking and the step is at the point of failure of its mounts. this failure has been noted on several other winnebagoitasca motore homes that i am aware of and is not limited to one unit but seems to be a wide spread problem. winnebago's responce is that it is a known failure but they are not willing to put out a tsb or recall. they are also refusing to help with the cost of these repairs and are leaving the full burden upon the owners. if the steps fail while someone is entering or exiting the coach morbidity could be a very real consequence for those using the steps. i have taken the step out of service until such time that corrective action can be taken.  view
2006-08-17 Pekin, IN
Dt*: the contact stated after parking the vehicle, a noise like a small electric motor running was heard. the underside of the vehicle was inspected by the contact. the plug to the abs antilock brake pump was disconnected. a service dealer was contacted and offered to diagnose and replace the pump at half the cost. the manufacturer was notified and made the same offer. updated 10/25/2006  view
2006-08-30 Pikesville, MD
Dt*: the contact stated the passenger and driver's side rear tires and the passenger side front tire lost air. there were cracks in the sidewall of the tires and the cracks were getting progressively worse. the tires were goodyear, eagle tire; gp-h size: p205/55/r16. the manufacturer has not yet been notified. updated 10/25/2006 -  view
2006-08-30 Pikesville, MD
Dt*: the contact stated the passenger and driver's side rear tires and the passenger side front tire lost air. there were cracks in the sidewall of the tires and the cracks were getting progressively worse. the tires were goodyear, eagle tire; gp-h size: p205/55/r16. the manufacturer has not yet been notified. updated 10/25/2006 -  view
2006-08-31 Miami, FL
Dt*: the contact stated both headlights were extremely cloudy making visibility very limited. the dealership was made aware of the problem. updated 10/25/2006 - the dealer said they could buff the inside of both headlights, at cost to the consumer.  view
2006-09-05 Entiat, WA
Dt*: the contact stated since purchase, there was a shimmy in the handle bars and premature wear on the front tire. the dealership suggested the contact check the tire pressure constantly. updated 10/25/2006 -  view
2006-09-06 College Park, MD
Dt*: the contact stated when the brake was applied, the pedal and the front end shimmied while traveling 50 mph. the dealership determined that the rotors were too thin to be filed down and needed to be replaced. updated 10/25/2006 -  view
2006-09-06 Chatsworth, CA
Dt*: the contact stated while driving 35 mph under normal road conditions, the hydraulic braking system failed. the failure occurred intermittently. the abs activated at low speeds. there was no warning prior to the failure. as a result, when applying the brake, the vehicle did not stop and resulted in two rear end collisions. the accidents were reported to the insurance. the vehicle was taken to the service dealer who could not duplicate the problem. the manufacturer was alerted but denied the claim. updated 10/25/2006 -  view
2006-09-13 Jericho, NY
Dt*: the contact stated the ignition was designed with a keyless push button starter and upon exiting the vehicle there was no alarm to remind the occupants to depress the button to turn off the engine. the dealer and manufacturer were alerted. updated 10/25/2006 - the consumer has inadvertently lock the vehicle and left it running twice.  view
comments/
Keywords:
GMC K10 Comments and Complaints, Safety Comments and Complaints GMC K10, GMC K10 Vehicle Safety Comments and Complaints, Comments and Complaints GMC K10, GMC K10 Comments and Complaints, Vehicle Comments and Complaints GMC K10, GMC K10 Comments and Complaints Vehicle

Page Description:
GMC Comments and Complaints - Vehicle Safety Comments and Complaints Information for GMC K10

Quick Find

 




Home  |  Auto Blog  |  Vehicle Recalls  |  Service Bulletins  |  All World B2B

New Autos