1995 GMC C15 User Comment / Complaint

1995 GMC C15 User Comment / Complaint

HOME » G » GMC » C15 » 1995 » Wheel and handle bar » comment/complaint
1995-07-13 00:00:00 Miami, FL

While driving, steering wheel became inoperative due to bolt missing of fallen out. please describe details.

Send us your comment

Email
change GMC
Comment Requirements
Email
* Required - We will send a verification link to this email before your comment is posted.
Password
Optional - If you leave many comments and do not want to verify each one individually, put a password in this field. Your first comment will still need to be verified, but after it has you will be able to post comments immediatlely without having to wait for the verification email from our servers.
Location
Optional - City & State if you live in the US or Canada, City & Country if you live anywhere else
Make / Model / Year
* Required
Image Form Verification
* Required
Password
change C15
Location
change 1995
Comment    Max Characters: 1000 -- Remaining: 1000
Security Image Enter letters from box to the left
   
1995-07-13 Miami, FL
While driving, steering wheel became inoperative due to bolt missing of fallen out. please describe details.  view
2004-01-15 Berkeley Heights, NJ
Known daimler chrysler issue (engine failure after low oil pressure) has occurred on my vehicle. i am in the 39 month of a 39 month lease and out of warranty. dealer wants me to pay for a new motor which will cost between $5000 and $8000.  view
2004-01-15 Fountain Hills, AZ
Manufacturer refuses to service faulty brake system while under warranty - 2002 toyota tundra 2/03-i took my 2002 toyota tundra to a dealership in scottsdale, az (right toyota) with concern over brake pulsation. the mileage on my vehicle was 32,000 miles. the dealer informed me that my truck was due for a 30,000 mile service interval and checking brakes was normal procedure. i received an invoice noting my front brakes were 90% worn & rear brakes were 40% worn. the dealership offered to replace the front pads for $400. i declined and had my brakes serviced elsewhere 1/13/04-i took my truck to a second dealership in phoenix, az (camelback toyota) for the 60,000 mile service interval. the dealer performed the service and in the process of checking the brakes noted the entire brake system should have been replaced due to two technical service bulletins (#br004-02; #br003-02) the condition of the rotors and drums were warped, with excessive wear. the dealer wanted to replace the brake system. they said that the required service should have been performed under warranty with the tsbs. the mileage limit on those tsbs was 3 years or 36,000 miles. since i was over  view
2004-01-15 Fountain Hills, AZ
Manufacturer refuses to service faulty brake system while under warranty - 2002 toyota tundra 2/03-i took my 2002 toyota tundra to a dealership in scottsdale, az (right toyota) with concern over brake pulsation. the mileage on my vehicle was 32,000 miles. the dealer informed me that my truck was due for a 30,000 mile service interval and checking brakes was normal procedure. i received an invoice noting my front brakes were 90% worn & rear brakes were 40% worn. the dealership offered to replace the front pads for $400. i declined and had my brakes serviced elsewhere 1/13/04-i took my truck to a second dealership in phoenix, az (camelback toyota) for the 60,000 mile service interval. the dealer performed the service and in the process of checking the brakes noted the entire brake system should have been replaced due to two technical service bulletins (#br004-02; #br003-02) the condition of the rotors and drums were warped, with excessive wear. the dealer wanted to replace the brake system. they said that the required service should have been performed under warranty with the tsbs. the mileage limit on those tsbs was 3 years or 36,000 miles. since i was over  view
2004-01-15 Fountain Hills, AZ
Manufacturer refuses to service faulty brake system while under warranty - 2002 toyota tundra 2/03-i took my 2002 toyota tundra to a dealership in scottsdale, az (right toyota) with concern over brake pulsation. the mileage on my vehicle was 32,000 miles. the dealer informed me that my truck was due for a 30,000 mile service interval and checking brakes was normal procedure. i received an invoice noting my front brakes were 90% worn & rear brakes were 40% worn. the dealership offered to replace the front pads for $400. i declined and had my brakes serviced elsewhere 1/13/04-i took my truck to a second dealership in phoenix, az (camelback toyota) for the 60,000 mile service interval. the dealer performed the service and in the process of checking the brakes noted the entire brake system should have been replaced due to two technical service bulletins (#br004-02; #br003-02) the condition of the rotors and drums were warped, with excessive wear. the dealer wanted to replace the brake system. they said that the required service should have been performed under warranty with the tsbs. the mileage limit on those tsbs was 3 years or 36,000 miles. since i was over  view
2004-01-15 Loganville, GA
I kept smelling something hot when the headlights were on. when the low beams quit working, i removed the cover from the steering column since that is where the smell seemed to originate and it often felt hot. i found the wire to the low beam terminal of the dimmer switch had overheated burning off about an inch of insulation and damaging both the switch and the connector on the wiring harness. i have purchased a new switch and am preparing to repair the connector.  view
2004-01-15 Harpers Ferry, WV
My complaint is the lack of notification of maintenance and lubrication of the drive shaft coupler it can cause it to seize resulting in injury or death. the manufacture does not identify this part for maintenance in the owners, shop or maintenance manuals concerning our model: xvs 650.  view
2004-01-15 Danville, IL
I am deeply concerned that my children are not safe riding in our mini van. i have three children and the gen3 belts are in my van. i would like to see all vehicles with these specific belts be recalled and safe versions installed.  view
2004-01-15 Oakdale, MN
Went to start truck , starter turned slowly, truck would not start. tried again, same results, but with the smell of an electrical fire accompanied by a fair amount of smoke emanating from under the hood at the rear on the passenger side. further investigation found that the fire it self extinguished. damage unknown at this time. truck towed to dealer.  view
2004-01-15 Commerce, TX
Rack and pinion have had to be replaced 5 times. each time causes metal shavings in the power steering pump causing loss of steering.  view
2004-02-11 Phillipsburg, NJ
When turning steering wheel towards the righ steering wheel locked, causing the consumer to lose control of the vehicle. consumer took vehicle to the dealership to be inspected.  view
comments/
Keywords:
GMC C15 Comments and Complaints, Safety Comments and Complaints GMC C15, GMC C15 Vehicle Safety Comments and Complaints, Comments and Complaints GMC C15, GMC C15 Comments and Complaints, Vehicle Comments and Complaints GMC C15, GMC C15 Comments and Complaints Vehicle

Page Description:
GMC Comments and Complaints - Vehicle Safety Comments and Complaints Information for GMC C15

Quick Find

 




Home  |  Auto Blog  |  Vehicle Recalls  |  Service Bulletins  |  All World B2B

New Autos